جعجع: كيف يمكن أن نزاوج بين حرب حزب الله في سوريا ووجود دولة لبنانية؟

YOU are not listening to Geagea :)

but if you were, you would notice he is a moderate :)
and please do not talk to me about his past :) as you make me see the present of hizbushaitan :)

@geha: my friend @mckinl only listens to Nasrallah.

Hezbollah was responssible for the killing of 3000 lebanese (numb can always varry from a source to another but war in aklim al toufah was a fact), repossible for the assassination of comunist leaders in south lebanon also during 80s, comited kidnaping and kamikaz attempt then(u know if u take the journals from that period it is not hard to find specially that they were pride of those operations) nassralah said himself in the 80 on television (also available on youtube that his was milliting for islamic law tillthe andalousie..
So bravo FT judge him by his past, bravo..
I personaly chose to juge our politicians by there acts and current position (keeping in mind their past not to hv too much false expectations)...
But again bravo FT, plus one for u, now chupachups?

poor FT stupid as usual... so for geagea his past must be remembered and he should bejudged accordingly, but for your M8 allies who did also tok part in the civil war their past should not interfere? LOL

how idiot you are and irrelevant hypocrit... go play with kids your age....

thank god we have M8 to provide such clean people for our executive government positions...Berri as Speaker...this guy's history is well known to be squeaky clean.

mckinl, his position is of someone who does not want to keep taking part in a charade. If Hizbullah will not stop fighting for Assad or disarm or stop swearing allegiance to the Ayatollah's then what is the point of forming another make believe Lebanese government? You talk about the old guard stepping aside, when he is saying lets give a neutral government a chance that is a good place to start. He is not making the rules or enforcing his will on others he simply does not want to play in show.

i think he can answer without your stupid mediation, thanks.

Again FT, define criminal, hachem minkara a man who implemented charia in tripoli mina during civil war, pulled acide on unveilled women, excecuted leftists and comunists to take control over the city, put men in ciment and threw them in the sea alive... This guy is a march 8 figure, so this one is secular, progressist, democrate and geagea an assassin...
Bravo FT as always superb comments..
Now really chupachups?
PS:it goes for most march 8 and march 14 leaders but just tge fact to point at one and forget attrocity of the others to make a political point pissed me off that's why i hv chosen hachem minkara exemple (plus he was sent back to us from syria, as chaker el abssi and co...)

FT he is march 8 tripoli figure please get ur infos right at least u know who u defend..
Second moustakbal tolerates him cause el mina is not dahiyeh with full control to a party and military areas, and eventhough problem happened there (few years ago he tried to farbit unveilled women in the vicinity of issa ibn maryam mosq,his mosq and a lebanese soldier got shot in altercation...
And finaly fatfat gave him permit because he is an idiot (adding to that he probably got some presure from march8 friends, or they never do presure?...)
Now that i have answered ur question FR; chupachups?....

We need a secular state so we can all leave under the same law with the same rights..
But that is only my simple opignion...

Chupachups is a trade name, in fact one of the bloggers avatar is chupachpus, so please use cautiounly..
Plus one for u anyway imperatrice... Chupachups?