Netanyahu Vows to Keep Weapons from Hizbullah
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
Israel's prime minister insisted Sunday that he will not allow "dangerous weapons" to reach Hizbullah, following reports that Israel recently carried out an airstrike in northern Syria against a shipment of advanced missiles.
The airstrike in Latakia reportedly targeted Russian Yakhont anti-ship missiles, one of the types of advanced weapons that Israeli officials have previously said they would not allow to reach Syria. It would be the fourth known airstrike against Syria this year.
Asked about the reports on the CBS-TV show "Face the Nation," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused to confirm or deny Israeli involvement in the latest airstrike.
"My policy is to prevent the transfer of dangerous weapons to Hizbullah ... in Lebanon and other terror groups as well. And we stand by that policy," he said.
Israel has been carefully watching the Syrian conflict since it erupted in March 2011. While it has been careful not to take sides in the civil war, Israel has repeatedly said it would take action to prevent what it calls "game changing" weapons, including chemical weapons and advanced guided missiles, from reaching Hizbullah or other hostile groups. Syria's President Bashar Assad is a key backer of Hizbullah.
In January, Israeli aircraft destroyed what was believed to be a shipment of advanced Russian anti-aircraft missiles in Syria that were bound for Lebanon. In May, a pair of Israeli airstrikes near Damascus targeted advanced Iranian ground-to-ground missiles also thought to be headed for Hizbullah. Israel has never confirmed involvement in any of the airstrikes.
Following the May attack, Assad vowed to retaliate if Israel struck his territory again. He has not commented on the latest alleged airstrike.
Hizbullah has also been quiet. The group's Al-Manar TV station reported on its website on the day of the July 5 explosions that blasts were heard in the area.
It said the blasts were most likely caused by shells from rebel-held areas that crashed into an army base. It quoted a "military expert" as denying reports that the attack originated from the air or sea or that any "enemy" aircrafts were involved.
Yakhont missiles are powerful anti-ship weapons launched from the shore that are difficult to defend against.
They travel at twice the speed of sound close to the surface of the water, making it hard for radar to detect them. Israel sees them as threatening its military and commercial installations along the coast, including its offshore natural gas reserves.
Hizbullah used a less-advanced Iranian surface-to-sea missile to hit an Israeli warship during a monthlong 2006 war. That attack killed four Israeli sailors.
15 July 2013, 11:46
55
"January 13, 1983:
* Following three weeks of negotiations, Israel and Lebanon agree on an agenda for peace talks."
30 years later and still nothing.
Who is to blame ?
15 July 2013, 12:42
22
The1phoenix - please don't confuse yourself between me and Phil - we are two different people.
15 July 2013, 15:02
04
What happened to the threat that Syria will retaliate against Israel? a77a ya Bicho
15 July 2013, 15:28
23
@the_roar, nice post. My two cents are as follows: there can only be peace with Israel when every last Palestinian is guaranteed and granted the right of return to Palestine. Period, the end. I am a proponent of the two state solution and want to see all refugees go home. As to HA, anyone who still believes they exist to defend our southern borders, are choosing to ignore reality and I respect that. HA is a tool which gives otherwise marginalized Shia the rights that were striped from them on one hand and leverage for Iran to be a thorn in the thigh of the US/Israel on the other. Lebanon is a victim of dirty M8 and M14 politician getting rich and securing their personal interest ahead of that of the Lebanese.
15 July 2013, 17:19
01
@the_roar, in a world of fairness and equality your words would ring true. The sad reality is completely different though. If you look at the surrounding countries, Israel, Syria, the Gulf states and Saddam's Iraq, all benefited from Lebanon's demise and have no real interest whatsoever to see a prosperous per-civil war era Lebanon to re-emerge and dominate the middle-east. Lebanon hosts thru the greed or maybe naivety of its political class, all the problems of the Arab world, forgotten and swept under the rug but festering and ready for ignition by third parties keeping us occupied while they leap forward and we slip backwards. Beirut in the late sixties and early seventies was as good as the middle east gets and a pioneering Arab state. There is no interest whatsoever by friends or foe of this little country for it to heal and succeed.
15 July 2013, 19:00
00
"Phil the problem is not HA"...LMAO! the_BORE.....seriously man get off that bottle!
15 July 2013, 20:09
11
Theroar, while I do see the logic in your arguements regarding Israel, if this applied to any other state than Israel then I might be inclined to agree with you, however, I think you are missing the point that it isnt Lebanon that doesnt want peace, its rather the other way around. Israels idea of peace means it dictates and imposes the terms and conditions. Moreover, I truelly think Israel was created for the purpose of perpetual conflict in the middle east. Do you think the west gives Israel billions of dollars annually because they love the jews, i dont think so. If the Israelis want peace so bad, why are they so interested in bombing Iran, where is the logic in that. And please dont tell me that you truelly believe in the myth that Jews are the chosen people, you do know that jews are not a race by the way.
15 July 2013, 20:39
20
@cityboy, "Do you think the west gives Israel billions of dollars annually because they love the jews" actually no, no reasonable person believes that. The way I see it is the Jews are incredibly talented at invoking and pushing the Golda Meyer 'holocaust' button to get pretty much whatever they want and probably rightfully so (please do not label me an Israeli agent) however I do believe Israel wants peace (albeit on their somewhat unreasonable terms) while certain elements on the opposing side want to simply take all as opposed to accepting reality and sharing. I am convinced however Israel will do everything in its power, right or wrong, to circumvent the return of millions of displaced Palestinian refugees. I cannot abide or accept a peace with Israel until they guarantee and grant the right of return first and foremost. When Israel agrees to this and the Arabs accept the two state solution, there will be the beginnings of real peace.
15 July 2013, 22:18
01
Bandoul, I think there is a lot more to Israel then simply a group of people that have experienced wrongs to them in europe. You have the Israeli mossad that is involved in activities way beyond the middle east, right into africa, south america and the rest of asia. I am not convinced that Israel was established for any noble reasons. If that were truelly the case, I am sure that the jews blessed with many many academics could have come up with answers years ago to live in peace with the arabs even if it meant the return of all palestinians and an establishment of a plural society. The irony of the jews is they are the first to push for a mixed society in any western country but are adament it doesnt happen in israel. I also want to remind you of Israels bombing of Qana two times, those bombings were simply for the purpose of creating hate towards Israel and hence extend the conflict for many years to come.
15 July 2013, 20:44
20
I know that I am going to be "crucified" for this but I'm going to write it anyway.
If we are talking about people going back to where they came from, just how many generations are we talking about? Just remember that the original Arabs who spread out over the Middle East came originally from the deserts of What is now Saudi Arabia. The dark skinned "Palestinians" started out from Nubia, (Upper Egypt and Sudan).
There is no argument that the Jews have been in Jerusalem for over 3000 years, need I go on?
15 July 2013, 21:09
11
@phillipo, I am referring to Palestinian refugees in refugee camps across the Arab world who were expelled from Palestine at the onset of the Israeli state, nothing more and nothing less. And why should you be crucified for stating facts? I think maybe you misunderstood which refugees I referring to? Yes the Jews were in Palestine thousands of years before the Arabs arrived and settled there thru wars.
15 July 2013, 23:46
01
Philipo... Hahahaha no we don't crucify here... I think u get what I'm saying.
Yea u are right, "dark skinned" Palestinians came from everywhere but Palestine. On the other hand, the white skinned, blonde hair Jews from Europe... Well they've been in Jerusalem for 3000yrs!! Lool
Stop your propaganda, it only works on young Lebanese living abroad. Here we know what ur ppl are.
Ps... If we are taking the bible as proof, lets talk about Abraham... His first son is the father of the Arabs, and his second son the Jews... So if anything, we are to share the land, or since Ishmael (Arabs) was the first son, he is his fathers heir!
15 July 2013, 23:29
12
Israelis are evil people. They don't want peace with anyone.
What happened in 1983??? Ask israel what took them to the heart of Beirut.
How anyone can stand up for a racist blood thirsty nation like Israel is beyond me!
We held Spain for hundreds of years... Israel's 60 years are but a drop in the bucket. They will leave, they are not from here.
15 July 2013, 23:37
20
The roar, dude plz plz read some history! Don't take what Israeli say for face value. They are masters of deception.
Are we forgetting that Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, and by 83 they were inside Beirut?? The Israeli OCCUPATION OF LEBANON did not end till 2000! They don't want peace they want HA disarmed, period.
Btw... HA came after Israel invaded, not the other way around! These ppl disobeyed Moses, killed Jesus, and betrayed Mohamad... Nothing they say is to be believed!
The roar did you know that Saudi gave them an offer of full peace and normal relations between Israel and ALL the Arab countries?? Israel ignored it! The off is still on the table, and I'm 100% for it. So phill and Phillipo plz go ask your ppl why they have refused peace???
15 July 2013, 23:54
11
I can't believe the amount of Israeli propaganda here :/
You can't ask the victim to make peace! That is called surrendering. We will never stop fighting BACK!
When Israel decides to make peace, we are all ready.
16 July 2013, 01:10
02
Agreed bb00, its the old fairytale that we hear all the time, Israel is just a tiny piece of land and all it wants is to live in peace, only if those arabs would just leave it alone. As for the jews from europe, russia and other far flong places, one has to wonder what was or still is the agenda behind bringing these non mideastern people to come and live in Israel, especially when a palestinian in a refugee camp in lebanon is not even allowed to return to their home.
